Lecture 14 - The Short-Run Trade-Off Between Inflation and Unemployment (Phillips Curve)
1. Macroeconomic Context
In previous lectures the AD–AS framework demonstrated that the classical dichotomy holds only in the long run. In the short run, nominal and real variables interact because prices and expectations adjust slowly.
In particular:
- Expansionary policy raises aggregate demand
- Higher aggregate demand increases output
- Higher output reduces unemployment
- Rising demand pressures lead to higher inflation
This short-run relationship between inflation and unemployment is captured by the Phillips Curve.
Phillips Curve
A macroeconomic relationship describing the short-run negative association between the inflation rate and the unemployment rate.
Historically, the relationship was first documented by A.W. Phillips (1958) using UK data from 1861–1957, showing that periods of low unemployment tended to coincide with higher wage or price inflation.
When labour markets are tight and unemployment is low, firms must compete for workers by raising wages. Rising wages increase production costs and therefore lead to higher price inflation. Conversely, when unemployment is high, wage pressure weakens and inflation falls.
2. The Short-Run Phillips Curve
The basic empirical observation is a downward-sloping relationship between inflation and unemployment.
The figure illustrates two possible macroeconomic outcomes:
-
Point A:
- Low inflation
- High unemployment
-
Point B:
- High inflation
- Low unemployment
The diagram therefore shows the short-run trade-off faced by policymakers: reducing unemployment tends to require tolerating higher inflation.
The Phillips curve can be interpreted as a reduced-form representation of aggregate demand management. When policy stimulates demand, firms increase production and hire more labour. As economic slack disappears, price pressures rise. Thus inflation and unemployment move in opposite directions in the short run.
3. Linking the Phillips Curve to the AD–AS Model
The Phillips curve can be derived directly from the AD–AS framework.
Panel (a) shows the AD–AS model:
- Low aggregate demand leads to low output and low prices
- High aggregate demand leads to higher output and higher prices
Panel (b) converts these outcomes into inflation and unemployment outcomes:
| Aggregate Demand | Output | Inflation | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low AD | Low | Low | High |
| High AD | High | High | Low |
Thus:
Higher AD → higher output → lower unemployment → higher inflation
When firms experience rising demand they increase production and hire workers. Labour markets tighten and wages rise. These wage increases feed through to prices, producing inflation.
If asked to explain the Phillips Curve using AD–AS, always explain:
- AD expansion increases output
- unemployment falls
- price level rises
- therefore inflation increases
4. The Long-Run Phillips Curve
The short-run trade-off does not persist in the long run.
The long-run Phillips curve is vertical at the natural rate of unemployment.
Key implications:
- Expansionary monetary policy raises inflation
- But does not reduce unemployment permanently
- Output returns to potential
This mirrors the vertical long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) curve.
Natural Rate of Unemployment
The level of unemployment determined by labour market institutions such as job search frictions, unions, minimum wages, and efficiency wages.
In the long run, expectations adjust and nominal variables fully reflect monetary changes. Because real wages and prices adjust, unemployment returns to the level determined by structural labour market conditions rather than by inflation.
5. The Role of Expectations
The short-run Phillips curve exists only because actual inflation differs from expected inflation.
The expectations-augmented Phillips Curve states:
Where:
= unemployment = natural rate of unemployment = actual inflation = expected inflation = responsiveness parameter
Implication:
- If actual inflation exceeds expected inflation, unemployment falls.
Unexpected inflation temporarily lowers real wages because workers negotiated wages based on lower expected inflation. Firms therefore find labour cheaper and hire more workers.
The Phillips curve is not a permanent policy menu.
Policymakers cannot permanently choose lower unemployment in exchange for higher inflation.
6. The Phillips Curve in the 1960s
Early empirical evidence seemed to confirm a stable negative relationship.
Data from 1961–1968 showed a clear downward relationship between inflation and unemployment.
This led many economists to believe that governments could choose combinations of inflation and unemployment through demand management.
However this interpretation proved incorrect.
7. The Breakdown of the Phillips Curve
During the 1970s, many economies experienced stagflation:
- High inflation
- High unemployment
This breakdown occurred because:
- inflation expectations adjusted upward
- workers demanded higher wages
- the short-run Phillips curve shifted upward
Thus the economy moved along the long-run Phillips curve, not along a stable short-run trade-off.
Friedman and Phelps argued that the Phillips curve must incorporate expectations. When people anticipate inflation, wage demands adjust immediately. As a result, expansionary policy produces only higher inflation without permanently reducing unemployment.
8. Shifts in the Short-Run Phillips Curve
Changes in expected inflation shift the short-run Phillips curve.
If expected inflation increases:
- the entire Phillips curve shifts upward
If expected inflation decreases:
- the curve shifts downward
Sources of shifts include:
- oil price shocks
- monetary policy credibility
- inflation expectations
9. Disinflation and the Sacrifice Ratio
Reducing inflation requires contractionary monetary policy, which reduces aggregate demand.
Short-run effects:
- lower inflation
- higher unemployment
- reduced output
The economy initially moves along the short-run Phillips curve.
Over time:
- expected inflation falls
- the Phillips curve shifts downward
- unemployment returns to the natural rate
Sacrifice Ratio
The percentage of annual output lost when reducing inflation by one percentage point.
Typical estimates:
- sacrifice ratio ≈ 3–5
Thus reducing inflation by 1% costs roughly 3–5% of annual GDP during the adjustment.
10. Historical Example: The Thatcher Disinflation
During the early 1980s:
- UK inflation exceeded 20%
- monetary tightening reduced inflation to about 5%
The policy succeeded in lowering inflation but produced:
- very high unemployment
- recessionary conditions
However the economic cost was smaller than predicted by simple sacrifice ratio calculations.
11. Rational Expectations and Costless Disinflation
Some economists argue that disinflation could be less costly if expectations adjust immediately.
Rational Expectations
The hypothesis that economic agents use all available information, including knowledge of policy, to forecast future economic variables.
If the central bank is credible:
- people immediately lower inflation expectations
- the Phillips curve shifts downward quickly
- inflation falls without large unemployment increases
Credibility is central to modern monetary policy. If the public believes the central bank's commitment to low inflation, wage and price setters adjust expectations immediately, preventing costly recessions.
12. Inflation Targeting and Central Bank Credibility
Modern central banks attempt to anchor expectations through inflation targeting.
Typical policy framework:
- explicit inflation target (e.g. 2%)
- transparent policy communication
- independent central bank
Benefits:
- stabilises expectations
- reduces inflation volatility
- lowers sacrifice ratio
If firms and households believe inflation will remain near 2%, wage contracts and price setting will reflect this expectation. This prevents persistent inflation spirals.
13. Policy Implications
Key lessons for macroeconomic policy:
- Short-run inflation–unemployment trade-offs exist
- Long-run trade-offs do not
- Expectations determine the dynamics of inflation
- Credible monetary policy reduces adjustment costs
Key Takeaways
- The Phillips Curve describes the short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
- The long-run Phillips curve is vertical at the natural rate of unemployment.
- Unexpected inflation temporarily lowers unemployment.
- Changes in expected inflation shift the short-run Phillips curve.
- Disinflation often requires costly recessions unless policy is highly credible.
- Modern monetary policy uses inflation targeting to anchor expectations.
Bibliography
Friedman, M. (1968) The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review.
Mankiw, N.G. and Taylor, M.P. (2023) Macroeconomics. 6th edn. London: Cengage Learning.
Phillips, A.W. (1958) ‘The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wages in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957’. Economica.






