Lecture 6 - The Economics of the World Trade Organisation (WTO)
Three questions to be covered in the lecture
- Why do we need WTO?
- How successful is WTO?
- Does regional integration conflict with the WTO?
Why do we need the WTO?
It's based of a market system, the WTO provides a central point for a country to sign a trade deal instead of having to do it to many different countries.
Specialisation (cf. comparative advantage), resources used efficiently.
Economies of scale: spreading overheads in R&D in the bigger market
Wider market enables competition-induced efficiency.
National markets are too small for efficiency in many industries
But governments face many pressures to restrict imports, especially from weak industry.
Why, despite adversities arisen from trade then?
Governments likely to take short-term view, protect
I.e workers and producers may lobby for protectionism. To protect their business in rational self interest, however may have adverse effects due to retaliatory policies.
Therefore open trade requires a set of agreed rules and sanctions.
- WTO has a dispute settlement system
- Expert review and recommendation
- Sanction of higher trade barriers against offenders
WTO Principles
- Non discrimination, all members have the same treatment as opposed to MFN (most favoured nations, and national treatment)
- Transparency, use tariffs that are clear and public, avoiding uneccessary red tape and administrative barriers.
- Reduce trade barriers progressively, reciprocate when possible
- Multilateral action instead of one way/unilateral
- Fair trade, no dumping and "bad behaviour"
- Special and differential treatment for Developing Countries to boost global economy
Cf. World Trade Organization (n.d.) Understanding the WTO: The Organization. Available at: https://www.wto.org/English/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact2_e.htm (Accessed: 22 October 2025).
WTO Procedures
During negotiations, WTO members will "bind" import tariffs. This is a commitment not to raise the rates of tariffs for each specific product.
Raising a "fixed" tariff would result in other members inducing retaliatory policies.
Is the WTO a success?
Arguments for:
The general consensus is that the WTO is a success. Where trade growth has exceeded GDP (volume +6%/year since 1980s > World GDP growth=below 4%)
Respected institution until recently see:
Wikipedia contributors (2025) Tariffs in the second Trump administration. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Last modified 21 October 2025, 01:10 UTC. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tariffs_in_the_second_Trump_administration&oldid=1317953139 (Accessed: 22 October 2025).
Due to the rules and dispute settlement system to resolve trade quarrles works quicker during tough times. But losers may substitute other measures for those that are found to break WTO rules cf. Hofmann & Kim 2012
The WTO enabled protection in economic crisis such as 2008. Despite trade falling 12% in 2012. WTO renegotiations allow trade to recover to the pre-crisis level. The WTO lobbied for lower tarrifs across other countries.
Arguments against:
Some rules can be abused. For example, anti-dumping
Some WTO trade rules can be abused. For example, anti-dumping rules are designed to stop exporters from selling goods abroad below their average cost (
However, countries can manipulate these rules to protect their own industries rather than ensure fair trade. This becomes a form of hidden protectionism, where a government imposes an anti-dumping tax on foreign goods that are simply cheaper, not unfairly priced.
For instance, the UK once imposed extra duties on Chinese-made football merchandise, claiming it was being dumped — even though it may have just been genuinely low-cost production.
The caveat here: importers can manipulate an exporters AC values to overvalue the average cost. In large markets it becomes harder to get an accurate, reliable value.
Bilateral agreements
Rapid increase in bilateral (direct) agreements undermines the WTO as countries are taking deals independent of the WTO. That can leave external countries behind.
Massive trade imbalances
The US-China, by influencing the value of your currency, such as the USD which is what is global reserve currency, influencing the money supply could have adverse impacts on central banks outside the US due to imbalances in the exchange rate.
Slowdown in trade growth.
Does regional integration conflict with WTO?
Despite this being legal (with respect to WTO policies), forming FTAs and CUs independently under certain conditions
Article 24 (GATT) stipulates:
- be formed speedily
- cover substantially all trade of the participants
- not raise trade barriers against non-members (any increases must be compensated)
The potential danger is that Europe may only trade with each-other, NA may only trade each-other and so-forth. This could be a potential recipe for conflict as MNCs are working hard to oppose each-other. Reducing efficiency derived from competition in global markets.
See Spaghetti Bowl:
